Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques and conservative therapies are useful tools for treating proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), but it is important to understand how to properly utilize them. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for PHF. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until June 2022. Conservative therapy-controlled or head-to-head RCTs of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) used for the treatment of adult patients with PHF were included. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were applied to compare and rank the effects of medical treatments for PHF. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs involving 1,182 patients with PHF were selected for the final analysis. Mostly baseline characteristics among groups were well balanced, and the imbalanced factors only included age, injury type, medial comminution, blood loss, and cognitive function in single trial. The SUCRA probabilities found that RTSA provided the best effect on the Constant-Murley score (SUCRA: 100.0%), and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score (SUCRA: 99.0%). Moreover, HA (SUCRA: 85.5%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 68.0%) had a relatively better effect on health-related quality of life than the other treatment modalities. Furthermore, conservative therapy (SUCRA: 84.3%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 80.7%) were associated with a lower risk of secondary surgery. Finally, the best effects on the risk of complications are varied, including infection was observed with conservative therapy (SUCRA: 94.2%); avascular necrosis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 78.1%), nonunion was observed in RTSA (SUCRA: 69.6%), and osteoarthritis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 93.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that RTSA was associated with better functional outcomes, while the comparative outcomes of secondary surgery and complications varied. Optimal treatment for PHF should consider patient-specific factors.

Acromion fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty occur in predictable clusters.

BACKGROUND: Acromion and scapular spine fractures (ASFs) following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been reported at a rate of 3.9%. The location of the fracture has been shown to be an important factor in determining the outcomes of nonoperative treatment, with medial fractures having worse outcomes than lateral fractures. As the debate between operative and nonoperative treatment continues, a more precise understanding of the location of the fracture is necessary for effective management. The purpose of this study was to use 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) reconstruction to characterize the exact location of ASFs after RSA. METHODS: A retrospective review of 2 separate institutional shoulder and elbow repositories was performed. Patients with post-RSA ASFs documented by post-fracture CT scans were included. The query identified 48 patients who sustained postoperative ASFs after RSA between July 2008 and September 2021. CT scans of patients with ASFs were segmented using Mimics software. Eight patients were excluded because of poor image quality. Each bone model was manipulated using 3-Matic Medical software to align the individual scapula with an idealized bone model to create a view of scapular fracture locations on a normalized bone model. This model was used to classify the fractures using the modified Levy classification. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 40 patients with a diagnosis of postoperative ASF after RSA. The median age at the time of surgery was 76 years (interquartile range, 73-79 years). The cohort comprised 32 women (80%) and 8 men (20%), with a median body mass index of 27.8. Only 10 patients (25%) had a previous diagnosis of osteoporosis and 6 (13%) had a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis; 53% of patients underwent RSA owing to rotator cuff tear arthropathy. The distribution of fracture locations was similar within the cohort. However, lateral fractures were slightly more prevalent. The most common fracture location was the type I zone, with 12 fracture lines (29%). There were 11 fracture lines (26%) in the type IIa zone, 10 (23%) in the type IIb zone, 0 in the type IIc zone, and 9 (21%) in the type III zone. CONCLUSION: ASFs after RSA occur in 4 predictable clusters. No fractures appeared to distinctly cluster in the type IIc zone, which may not represent a true fracture zone. Understanding the distribution of these fractures will help to enable the future design of implants and devices to stabilize the fractures that require fixation.

Does age affect patient outcomes after humeral head replacement in the treatment of acute proximal humeral fractures? A comparative cohort study with a minimum 10 years long-term follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Humeral head replacement (HHR) is now rarely recommended for complex proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in older patients. However, in relatively young and active patients with unreconstructable complex PHFs, controversy still exists regarding the treatment options of reverse shoulder arthroplasty and HHR. The goal of this study was to compare the survival, functional, and radiographic outcomes of HHR in patients aged <70 years and those aged ≥70 years after a minimum 10 years follow-up. METHODS: Eighty-seven out of 135 patients undergoing primary HHR were enrolled and then divided into 2 groups based on age: <70 years and ≥70 years. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. RESULTS: There were 64 patients (mean, 54.9 years) in the younger group and 23 patients (mean, 73.5 years) in the older group. The younger and older groups had comparable 10-year implant survivorship (98.4% vs. 91.3%). Patients aged ≥70 years had worse American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (74.2 vs. 81.0, P = .042) and lower satisfaction rates (12% vs. 64%, P < .001) than younger patients. At the final follow-up, older patients had worse forward flexion (117° vs. 129°, P = .047) and internal rotation (17 vs. 15, P = .036). More greater tuberosity complications (39% vs. 16%, P = .019), glenoid erosion (100% vs. 59%, P = .077), and humeral head superior migration (80% vs. 31%, P = .037) were also identified in patients aged ≥70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike the increased risk for revision and functional deterioration over time after reverse shoulder arthroplasty for PHFs in younger patients, a high implant survival rate with lasting pain relief and stable functional outcomes could be observed in younger patients after HHR during long-term follow-up. Patients aged ≥70 years had worse clinical outcomes, lower patient satisfaction, more greater tuberosity complications, and more glenoid erosion and humeral head superior migration than those aged <70 years. HHR should not be recommended for the treatment of unreconstructable complex acute PHFs in older patient populations.

Comparison of Outcomes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With Proximal Humerus Fractures Versus Rotator Cuff Arthropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Indications for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has expanded to encompass complex proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) in recent years. The purpose of this study was to report and assess whether PHF patients treated with rTSA could achieve similar functional outcomes and short-term survivorship to patients who underwent rTSA for rotator cuff arthropathy (RTCA). METHODS: All consecutive patients with a preoperative diagnosis of PHF or RTCA, 18 years or older, treated with rTSA at a single academic institution between 2018 and 2020 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes were survivorship defined as revision surgery or implant failure analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival curve, and functional outcomes, which included Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, and range of motion (ROM) were compared at multiple follow-up time points up to 2 years. Secondary outcomes were patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical data, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included: 21 patients (44%) were diagnosed with PHF and 27 patients (56%) had RTCA. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate estimates at 3 years were 90.5% in the PHF group and 85.2% in the RTCA group. No differences in revision surgery rates between the two groups (P = 0.68) or survivorship (P = 0.63) were found. ROM was significantly lower at subsequent follow-up time points in multiple planes (P < 0.05). A greater proportion of patients in the PHF group received cement for humeral implant fixation compared with the RTCA group (48% versus 7%, P = 0.002). The mean length of hospital stay was longer in PHF patients compared with RTCA patients (2.9 ± 3.8 days versus 1.6 ± 1.8 days, P = 0.13), and a significantly lower proportion of PHF patients were discharged home (67% versus 96%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The rTSA implant survivorship at 3 years for both PHF and RTCA patients show comparable results. At the 2-year follow-up, RTCA patients treated with rTSA were found to have better ROM compared with PHF patients.

Allografts are not necessary for displaced proximal humeral fractures in patients less than 65 years old, a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Displaced proximal humeral fractures (PHF) are frequently treated with locking plates to achieve osteosynthesis. Bone grafts are used as augmentation techniques to improve stability in osteoporotic patients. However, there has been little research into whether bone grafts are necessary for patients younger than 65 years old. This study compared radiographic and clinical outcomes between PHFs augmented with bone grafts or not in a younger population. METHODS: Between January 2016 and June 2020, 91 patients treated with a locking plate alone (LP), and 101 patients treated with locking plates augmented with bone grafts (BG) were analyzed. Potential confounding factors for outcomes were adjusted by propensity score-matching analyses. For the retrospective cohort study, 62 patients from each group were evaluated for radiographic outcomes and clinical outcomes and compared. RESULTS: Sixth-two patients in each group, both with a mean age of 52 years old, were with a mean follow-up time of 25 months in the LP group and 26 months in the BG group. There was no difference in demographic or surgical characteristics between the two groups after propensity score-matching. With regard to radiographic outcomes, the changes in neck-shaft angle (-5.1 ± 4.9 vs. -3.1 ± 5.3, p = 0.015) and humeral head height (-1.5 ± 2.5 vs. -0.4 ± 2.7, p = 0.002) were more obvious in the BG group. However, regarding functional outcomes, there were no significant differences between the two groups in DASH score, Constant-Murley score, or VAS score. Moreover, the complication rate was not significantly different between two groups. DISCUSSION: Allografts only provide minor improvements of stability in radiography for patients less than 65 years old after locking plate fixation of PHFs, but don't improve shoulder function, relieve pain or reduce complications. We concluded that allografts are unnecessary for younger patients with displaced PHFs.

Primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for fractures requires more revisions than for degenerative conditions 1 year after surgery: an analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

BACKGROUND: Although reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is considered a viable treatment strategy for proximal humeral fractures, there is an ongoing discussion of how its revision rate compares with indications performed in the elective setting. First, this study evaluated whether RTSA for fractures conveyed a higher revision rate than RTSA for degenerative conditions (osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, rotator cuff tear, or rheumatoid arthritis). Second, this study assessed whether there was a difference in patient-reported outcomes between these 2 groups following primary replacement. Finally, the results of conventional stem designs were compared with those of fracture-specific designs within the fracture group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study with registry data from the Netherlands, generated prospectively between 2014 and 2020. Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) were included if they underwent primary RTSA for a fracture (<4 weeks after trauma), osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, rotator cuff tear, or rheumatoid arthritis, with follow-up until first revision, death, or the end of the study period. The primary outcome was the revision rate. The secondary outcomes were the Oxford Shoulder Score, EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) score, numerical rating scale score (pain at rest and during activity), recommendation score, and scores assessing change in daily functioning and change in pain. RESULTS: This study included 8753 patients in the degenerative condition group (mean age, 74.3 ± 7.2 years) and 2104 patients in the fracture group (mean age, 74.3 ± 7.8 years). RTSA performed for fractures showed an early steep decline in survivorship: Adjusted for time, age, sex, and arthroplasty brand, the revision risk after 1 year was significantly higher in these patients than in those with degenerative conditions (hazard ratio [HR], 2.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-3.77). Over time, the HR steadily decreased, with an HR of 0.98 at year 6. Apart from the recommendation score (which was slightly better within the fracture group), there were no clinically relevant differences in the patient-reported outcome measures after 12 months. Patients who received conventional stems (n = 1137) did not have a higher likelihood of undergoing a revision procedure than those who received fracture-specific stems (n = 675) (HR, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-3.17). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing primary RTSA for fractures have a substantially higher likelihood of undergoing revision within the first year following the procedure than patients with degenerative conditions preoperatively. Although RTSA is regarded as a reliable and safe treatment option for fractures, surgeons should inform patients accordingly and incorporate this information in decision making when opting for head replacement surgery. There were no differences in patient-reported outcomes between the 2 groups and no differences in revision rates between conventional and fracture-specific stem designs.

Locking plate fixation versus intramedullary nail fixation for the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humerus fractures (OTA/AO type 11C): a preliminary comparison of clinical efficacy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate and intramedullary nail fixations in the treatment of patients with OTA/AO type 11C proximal humerus fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures who underwent surgery at our institution from June 2012 to June 2017. Perioperative indicators, postoperative morphological parameters of the proximal humerus, and Constant-Murley scores were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients with OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures were enrolled in this study. Overall, 35 patients underwent open reduction and plate screw internal fixation, and 33 patients underwent limited open reduction and locking of the proximal humerus with intramedullary nail internal fixation. The total cohort had a mean follow-up duration of 17.8 months. The mean operation time of the locking plate group was significantly longer than that of the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05), while the mean bleeding volume was significantly higher in the locking plate group than that in the intramedullary nail group (P < 0.05). The initial neck-shaft angles, final neck-shaft angles, forward flexion ranges, or Constant-Murley scores did not show significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Complications, including screw penetrations, acromion impingement syndrome, infection, and aseptic necrosis of the humeral head, occurred in 8 patients (8/35, 22.8%) in the locking plate group and 5 patients in the intramedullary nail group (5/33, 15.1%; including malunion and acromion impingement syndrome), with no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Similar satisfactory functional results can be achieved with locking plates and intramedullary nailing for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures, with no significant difference in the number of complications between these two techniques. However, intramedullary nailing has advantages over locking plates for OTA/AO type 11C1.1 and 11C3.1 proximal humerus fractures in terms of operation time and bleeding volume.

Assessing the Risk of Postoperative Complications for Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) has markedly risen over the past three decades. Patients with DM and CKD are at increased risk of infection, immune dysfunction, as well as bone and mineral disorders. Although we know that patients with DM and CKD have these risks, we do not know how these translate to proximal humeral fracture (PHF) healing. We sought to analyze whether these established comorbidities had increased rates of complications after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for PHF treatment. METHODS: Using a national insurance database, 72,365 patients with PHF managed with ORIF were identified using records from 2010 to 2022. Patients were initially split into those with DM and those without and were further stratified by the presence or absence of CKD. For our comparison baseline cohort, patients were not diagnosed with either DM or CKD. Post-ORIF complication rates were assessed looking specifically at nonunion, postoperative infection, and all-cause revision surgery. A logistic regression statistical analysis was also conducted. RESULTS: Of the 72,365 patients with PHF treated by ORIF, 41,047 were non-DM without CKD (comparison); 17,025 had DM alone (no CKD); 11,729 had DM and CKD; and 2564 had CKD alone (non-DM). Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with DM and/or CKD were at increased risk of developing nonunion (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 1.48, 1.23) and all-cause revision surgery (OR = 1.21, 1.11, 1.18) after ORIF for PHF compared with our comparison cohort. In addition, all patients with DM alone (non-CKD) and DM with CKD had an increased risk of postoperative infection (OR = 1.39, 1.26). CONCLUSION: The management of PHF is a controversial topic, particularly regarding the degree of intervention and optimal treatment choice. Regardless, using a pragmatic design and reviewing a national insurance database, this study provides information for patients in high-risk populations, specifically patients with DM and CKD, and may prove beneficial when selecting a patient-specific treatment plan. Additional studies are needed to assess varying stages of both DM and CKD in patients who sustain PHF treated by ORIF along with postoperative strategies to minimize complications.

Comparison of the ALPS and PHILOS plating systems in proximal humeral fracture fixation - a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Open reduction and plate osteosynthesis are considered as a successful technique for the treatment of proximal humerus fracture (PHF) despite high complication rates. The objective of our study was to review the clinical outcome and complications of the Anatomic Locking Plate System (ALPS) and compare it to the Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS). Our hypothesis was that ranges of motion (ROM) were superior and complication rates were lower with ALPS. METHODS: Twenty patients treated with ALPS for PHF were retrospectively compared to 27 patients treated with PHILOS. Union, ROM and complications were clinically and radiologically assessed at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 18-24 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Mean age was 52 ± 14 in the ALPS group and 58 ± 13 in the PHILOS group. Last follow-ups were conducted at a mean of 20.6 ± 4.8 months. Mean shoulder abduction was superior with ALPS by 14° (p-value = 0.036), 15° (p-value = 0.049), and 15° (p-value = 0.049) at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Mean shoulder external rotation was superior with ALPS by 11° (p-value = 0.032), 15° (p-value = 0.010) and 12° (p-value = 0.016) at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months respectively. At the end of the follow-up, ROM remained better with ALPS, but not significantly. Complication rates over 21 months reached 20% with ALPS and 48% with PHILOS (p-value = 0.045). Implant removal rates reached 10% with ALPS and 37% with PHILOS (p-value = 0.036). Avascular necrosis was the only cause for hardware removal in the ALPS group. CONCLUSION: The ALPS group showed better clinical outcomes with faster recovery in abduction and external rotation, although no difference in ROM remained after 21 months. Additionally, the complications rate was lower at last follow up. In our experience, the ALPS plating system is an effective management option in some PHF.

Long-term outcomes of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures.

PURPOSE: Shoulder hemiarthroplasty (HA) is now rarely indicated for complex proximal humeral fractures due to its unpredictable characteristic of the greater tuberosity (GT) healing. Despite the increasing popularity of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in fracture treatment, there are still concerns about failure revision and its application in young populations. The complete negation of HA for fracture treatment is still under debate. METHODS: Eighty-seven out of 135 patients with acute proximal humeral fractures treated with HA were enrolled. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up time of 14.7 years, the 10-year prosthetic survival rate was 96.6%. The mean ASES score and Constant score were 79.3 and 81.3, respectively, the mean VAS was 1.1, the average forward flexion was 125.9°, external rotation was 37.2°, and internal rotation was at the L4 level. Nineteen patients (21.8%) displayed GT complications and showed significantly worse outcomes. Glenoid erosion was observed in 64.9% of the patients and resulted in inferior outcomes. The patients who showed good postoperative two year functional outcomes and good acromiohumeral distances usually maintained their results without deterioration over time. CONCLUSIONS: With strict patient selection, a proper surgical technique and closely supervised postoperative rehabilitation, HA could achieve a 96.6% ten year survival rate and good pain relief at an average follow-up of 15 years. Although rarely indicated, HA should have a role in the treatment of acute complex proximal humeral fractures in relatively young and active patients with good GT bone and intact cuff.

Primary versus conversion reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical, implant-related, and patient-reported outcomes of shoulders undergoing conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) following previous open reduction-internal fixation vs. shoulders undergoing rTSA as a primary treatment modality for acute proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) in patients aged ≥65 years. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of patients who underwent primary rTSA for PHFs vs. a cohort who underwent conversion arthroplasty with rTSA following fracture repair between 2009 and 2020. Outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at latest follow-up. Demographic characteristics and outcomes were analyzed between cohorts using conventional statistics, as well as stratification by minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit thresholds where applicable. RESULTS: In total, 406 patients met the study criteria, of whom 322 underwent primary rTSA for PHF and 84 underwent conversion rTSA after failed PHF open reduction-internal fixation. The conversion rTSA cohort was, on average, 7 years younger than the primary rTSA cohort (65 ± 10 years vs. 72 ± 9 years, P < .001). The follow-up periods were similar between the cohorts, with an average of 47.1 months (range, 24-138 months). The percentages of Neer 3-part (41.9% vs. 45.2%) and 4-part (49.1% vs. 46.4%) PHFs were similar (P > .99). The primary rTSA cohort achieved higher forward elevation, external rotation, and patient-reported outcome measurements including Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California-Los Angeles, Constant, Shoulder Arthroplasty Smart, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores at a minimum of 24 months postoperatively (P < .05 for all). Patient satisfaction was higher in the primary rTSA group than in the conversion rTSA cohort (P = .002). Patient-reported outcome measures uniformly favored the primary rTSA cohort, rising to the level of statistical significance for forward elevation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score (P < .05) relative to substantial clinical benefit. The adverse event rate and revision rate in the conversion rTSA cohort were higher than those in the primary rTSA cohort (26.2% vs. 2.5% [P < .001] and 8.3% vs. 1.6% [P = .001], respectively). At 10 years postoperatively, the revision-free implant survival rate was significantly lower in the conversion cohort compared with the primary cohort (66% vs. 94%, P = .012). Finally, the hazard ratio of revision was 3.69 in the conversion rTSA cohort compared with only 1.0 in the primary rTSA cohort. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that elderly patients who undergo rTSA as a conversion procedure following previous osteosynthesis do not fare as well as those treated with rTSA for acute displaced PHFs. Conversion rTSA patients report lower patient satisfaction and have significantly restricted range of shoulder motion, a higher risk of complications, a higher risk of revision, poorer patient-reported outcomes, and a shorter implant survival rate at 10 years compared with patients undergoing acute rTSA.

Increased complication rates of salvage reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) after failed locked plate fixation compared with primary RTSA in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

HYPOTHESIS: Common surgical treatment options for proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients include locked plate fixation (LPF) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). It was hypothesized that secondary RTSA after LPF would be associated with higher complication rates and costs compared with primary RTSA. METHODS: We analyzed the health insurance data of patients aged ≥65 years who received RTSA for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture between January 2013 and September 2019 with a pre-study phase of 5 years. Multivariable Cox, logistic, and linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between treatment group and complications, hospital length of stay, charges, and mortality rate during a 34-month follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 14,220 patients underwent primary RTSA and 1282 patients underwent secondary RTSA after prior surgery using LPF for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. After adjustment for patient characteristics, more surgical complications were observed after secondary RTSA during index hospitalization (odds ratio, 4.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.00-5.34; P < .001) and long-term follow-up (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.27-1.81; P < .001). Moreover, secondary RTSA was associated with an increased cumulative total cost of €6638.1 (95% CI, €6229.9-€7046.5; P < .001). If conversion from LPF to secondary RTSA occurred during index hospitalization, more major adverse events, more thromboembolic events, and a higher mortality rate were found in the short and long term (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: Secondary RTSA is associated with higher total costs and more complications. Hence, if surgical treatment of a proximal humeral fracture in an elderly patient is needed, prognostic factors for LPF need to be evaluated carefully. If in doubt, the surgeon should opt to perform primary RTSA as patients will benefit in the long term.

Functional results and unfavorable events after treatment of proximal humerus fractures using a new locking plate system.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures are often treated with a fixed-angle titanium plate osteosynthesis. Recently, plates made of alternative materials such as carbon fibre-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) have been introduced. This study presents the postoperative results of patients treated with a CFR-PEEK plate. METHODS: Patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with a CFR-PEEK plate (PEEKPower™ Humeral Fracture Plate (HFP)) were included. In follow-up examination, age and gender adjusted Constant-Murley Score (ACS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QDASH) and pain score (Visual Analog Scale (VAS)) were analyzed. General condition at follow-up was measured by European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L). Range of motion was recorded. In addition, radiographs at follow-up, unfavorable events and revision rate were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 98 patients (66.0 ± 13.2 years, 74 females, 24 males) were reexamined. Mean follow-up was 27.6 ± 13.2 months. There were 15 2-part, 28 3-part and 55 4-part fractures. The functional scores showed good results: SSV 83.3 ± 15.6%, QDASH 13.1 ± 17.0 and ACS 80.4 ± 16.0. A 4-part-fracture, head split component, nonanatomic head shaft reposition and preoperative radiological signs of osteoarthritis were significant negative predictors for poorer clinical scores. Unfavourable events were observed in 27 patients (27.6%). Revision surgery was performed in 8 (8.2%) patients. Risk factors for an unfavourable event were female gender, age of 50 years and older, diabetes, affected dominant hand, 4-part fracture, head split and preoperative radiological signs of osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: There are several advantages of the CFR-PEEK plate (PEEKPower™ Humeral Fracture Plate (HFP)) such as the polyaxial screw placement and higher stability of locking screws. In summary, the CFR-PEEK plate osteosynthesis is a good alternative with comparable clinical results and some biomechanical advantages. Proximal humerus fractures show good clinical results after treatment with a CFR-PEEK plate. The revision rate and the risk of unfavorable events are not increased compared to conventional titanium plate osteosynthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Risk factors for loss of reduction following locked plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures in older adults.

PURPOSE: To identify characteristics associated with loss of reduction following open reduction and locked plate fixation (ORIF) of proximal humerus fractures in older adults and determine if loss of reduction affects patient reported outcomes (PROs), range of motion (ROM), and complication rates during the first postoperative year. METHODS: Patients >55 years old who underwent proximal humerus ORIF were reviewed. Patient and fracture characteristics were recorded. Fixation characteristics were measured on the initial postoperative AP radiograph including humeral head height (HHH) relative to the greater tuberosity (GT), head shaft angle (HSA), screw-calcar distance, and screw tip-joint surface distance. Loss of reduction was defined as GT displacement >5 mm or HSA displacement >10° on final follow up radiographs. Patient, fracture, and fixation characteristics were tested for association with loss of reduction. Outcomes including ROM, visual analog scale pain and PROMIS scores, and complication/reoperation rates during the first postoperative year were compared between those with or without loss of reduction. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were identified, 23 (29.1%) of which had a loss of reduction. Calcar comminution (relative risk [RR]=2.5, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]=1.3-5.0, p<0.01), HHH <5 mm above GT (RR=2.0, CI=1.0-3.9, p = 0.048), and screw-calcar distance ≥12 mm (RR=2.1, CI=1.1-4.1, p = 0.03) were risk factors for loss of reduction. Upon multivariate analysis, calcar comminution was determined to be an independent risk factor for loss of reduction (RR=2.4, CI=1.2-4.7, p = 0.01). Loss of reduction led to higher complication (44% vs 13%, p<0.01) and reoperation rates (30% vs 7%, p<0.01), and decreased achievement of satisfactory ROM (>90° active forward flexion, 57% vs 82%, p = 0.02) compared to maintained reduction, but similar PROs. CONCLUSIONS: Calcar comminution, decreased HHH, and increased screw-calcar distance are risk factors for loss of reduction following ORIF of proximal humerus fractures. These morphologic and technical factors are important considerations for prolonged reduction maintenance.

Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with a modern intramedullary nailing system for 2-part proximal humerus fractures.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains controversial. There are advocates for both open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws (ORIF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN). The purpose this study was to evaluate the early-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of IMN for isolated, displaced 2-part surgical neck PHFs using a modern, straight nail system and to determine the effect of preoperative patient and fracture characteristics on outcome. METHODS: This was a case series of 23 patients with displaced 2-part surgical neck PHFs who were treated with ORIF using a straight IMN with minimum follow-up of 1 year (mean 2.5 years [range, 1.1-4.6]). Patients were identified retrospectively and contacted for measurement of active range of motion (AROM) and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Visual Analog Scale Pain score (VAS Pain). Plain radiographs were evaluated to assess the quality of the reduction and failure of fixation. Complications and reoperations were identified. RESULTS: Reduction was anatomic in 12 (52%) patients, acceptable in 9 (39%), and 2 (9%) were malreduced. There were no differences in reduction quality based on sex (p = 0.37), age at surgery (p = 0.68), calcar comminution (p = 0.68), number of screws in the head (p = 0.99), or medial hinge disruption (p = 0.06). At final follow-up, the mean ASES score was 92 ± 10, OSS was 45 ± 4, SANE was 93 ± 7, EQ-5D of 0.85 ± 0.17, and VAS Pain was 0 ± 1. The mean active forward flexion was 143° ± 16°, active external rotation was 68° ± 20°, and internal rotation was T11 ± 4 vertebrae. Two (9%) patients underwent reoperation and 2 (9%) patients experienced clinical failure not requiring reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Straight IMN is a reliable treatment for displaced 2-part surgical neck PHFs with excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes in early follow-up. The implant facilitated anatomic or acceptable alignment of the fracture in the vast majority of patients.

Short-term Clinical Outcome of Dual Plate Fixation in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures with Calcar Comminution.

OBJECTIVE: Calcar comminution has been considered to be the main cause of the failure of internal fixation and fracture nonunion in proximal humerus surgery. Anatomical reduction and increasing the strength of internal fixation is the key to success. The purpose of this study was to investigate the short-term clinical effect of dual plate fixation in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with calcar comminution. METHODS: The data of 37 patients with proximal humeral fractures with calcar comminution, treated in our departments from July 2018 to April 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were treated with anterior plate and lateral PHILOS plate, and followed up for more than 12 months, including 25 cases in Tianjin Hospital and 12 cases in Shanghai General Hospital. The patients included 12 males and 25 females, their age was 54.89 ± 13.59 years (range from 32-79 years), and 21 patients had dominant hand injury. According to the Neer classification, there were 11 two-part fractures, 22 three-part fractures, and four four-part fractures. The range of motion of the shoulder joint, visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Constant-Murley shoulder score, neck-shaft angle, anterior-posterior angle, and other complication scores were recorded at the last follow-up. RESULTS: All 37 patients were followed up after operation, and the follow-up time was 21.81 ± 7.35 months (range from 12-36 months). The fractures of all 37 patients had healed at the last follow-up visit. The neck-shaft angle measured immediately after operation was 132.59° ± 8.34°, and the neck-shaft angle measured at the last follow-up visit was 132.38 ± 8.53°. The anterior-posterior angle measured immediately after surgery was 3.45° ± 0.81°, and the anterior-posterior angle at the last follow-up visit was 3.66° ± 0.77°. The range of motion of the shoulder joint was as follows: the shoulder joint could be forward elevated by 158.11° ± 13.09° (range: 140°-180°), rotated externally by 38.38° ± 7.55° (range: 20°-45°), and internally rotated to T4-L4 level. The VAS score was 0.46 ± 0.87 (range: 0-3), the ASES was 86.58 ± 8.79 (range: 56.7-100), and the Constant-Murley score was 88.76 ± 8.25 (range: 60-100). Thirty-three cases were excellent, and four cases were good. No obvious complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The combination of anterior plate and lateral PHILOS plate in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with calcar comminution can achieve stable fixation, and the postoperative clinical and imaging outcome was satisfactory. Firstly, the anterior plate can provide temporary stability when the Kirschner wires are removed, which can provide space for lateral plate placement during fracture reduction and fixation. Secondly, additional support by the anterior plate can provide higher stability in complex fractures with calcar comminution.

The use of medial support screw was associated with axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for axillary nerve injury after plate fixation of humeral fractures using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. We hypothesized that the use of medial support screw (MSS) would be associated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated consecutive 32 patients who underwent surgical treatments for proximal or midshaft humeral fractures. Of them, we included 26 patients who were examined by electromyography/nerve conduction (EMG/NCV) study at 3-4 weeks postoperatively. We excluded 6 patients because two of them were not compliant to EMG/NCV and the remaining two died due to unrelated medical illness. Outcome assessments included pain, functional scores, range of motion, and radiographic results. RESULTS: There were 8 male and 18 female patients with mean age of 67 ± 15 years. Mean duration of follow-up period was 31 ± 11 months. The mean time to EMG/NCS after surgery was 3.5 ± 0.6 weeks. EMG/NCS examinations revealed incomplete axillary nerve injury in 8 patients (31%) without complete nerve injury. Active forward elevation at 3 months postoperatively was significantly lower in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without it (99° ± 12 and 123° ± 37, respectively, p = 0.047), although final clinical outcomes were not different. At surgery, MSS was used in 17 patients (65%), and 8 of them were associated with nerve injury. The use of MSS was only correlated with the outcome of axillary nerve injury, because the axillary nerve injury developed only in MSS group (p = 0.047). The MMT grade 4 in abduction strength was more common in patients with axillary nerve injury than in those without (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Axillary nerve injury was a concern after plate fixation of proximal humeral fracture using minimal invasive deltoid-splitting approach. The use of medial support screw to improve the stability could increase a risk of axillary nerve injury when used with this approach.

Drain use can be avoided in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Drains have demonstrated no clear benefits and some potentially harmful effects in hip and knee replacements. There is little evidence about the effects of its use in shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that drain use would increase postoperative blood loss without reducing wound complications. METHODS: We included 103 reverse shoulder arthroplasties (RSA), 71 were operated for degenerative pathology, 32 due to a fracture. All complications were recorded. Hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Htc.) level were collected and compared to postoperative data. Length of hospitalization and volume output were also noted. RESULTS: 45 patients received a closed-suction drain. Patients with coagulopathy had significant higher bleeding and were excluded (p = 0.03). Patients operated for a fracture were older (80.1y.o vs 72.1 p < 0.01) and had higher blood drop (∆Hb p = 0.01; ∆Htc p = 0.03). There were neither differences between drain and control group in ∆Hb or ∆Htc in the degenerative RSA group (1.84+/-0.89 vs 1.68+/-0.84, p = 0.36; 5.78+/-2.89 vs 5.53+/-2.87 p = 0.50) nor in the fracture RSA group (2.65+/-0.94 vs 2.65+/-1.01, p = 0.90; 7.91+/-2.99 vs. 7.09+/-4.21, p = 0.56). There were neither differences in complications (degenerative p = 0.33; fracture p = 0.21). Drain use was related to a longer hospital stay in elective surgery (2.6 vs 1.8 days; p < 0.01). DISCUSSION: The rate of complication is similar between patients with and without drain use. Drain use after shoulder arthroplasty does not affect postoperative bleeding but increases the length of hospital stay. Drains seems to be an unnecessary intervention after RSA that may increase associated costs and can be safely abandoned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative study.

Inferior subluxation of humeral head after osteosynthesis for greater tuberosity fracture.

BACKGROUND: Inferior subluxation of the humeral head is frequently observed immediately after surgery for proximal humerus fractures; however, the incidence and risk factors of inferior subluxation after osteosynthesis for isolated greater tuberosity fractures remain unsolved. Additionally, the postoperative course of inferior subluxation has not been elucidated. The purpose of the present study is to identify the predictors for the occurrence of postoperative inferior subluxation by multivariate analysis and investigate the postoperative shift of inferior subluxation and its effect on surgical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 68 patients who underwent surgery for isolated greater tuberosity fractures. The dependent variable was the inferior subluxation at 1 week postoperatively. The explanatory variables were age, sex, affected side of the shoulder, body mass index, history of smoking, local osteoporosis, time period to surgery, axillary nerve injury, inferior subluxation before surgery, fracture dislocation, surgical approach, surgical method, operative time, amount of blood loss, and postoperative drainage. Baseline variables that were statistically significant in the univariate analyses were included in the logistic regression analysis. The patients were further categorized into two groups according to the presence of inferior shoulder subluxation exhibited 1 week postoperatively: patients with inferior subluxation (+ IS group) and patients without inferior subluxation (- IS group). We compared the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. RESULTS: Of 68 patients, 17 (25.0%) had inferior shoulder subluxation observed 1 week postoperatively. Multivariate analysis showed that long operative time was a risk factor for postoperative subluxation (odds ratio = 1.03; P = 0.030). In all cases, inferior subluxation disappeared within 3 months of surgery. No significant difference in complication rate was observed between the + IS and - IS groups. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides novel information regarding postoperative inferior subluxation of fractures of the greater tuberosity. Inferior subluxation occurred in 25% of patients immediately after surgery. Long operative time contributes to the onset of postoperative inferior subluxation; however, this was temporary in all cases and had no significant effect on the surgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.